1
00:00:00,020 --> 00:00:29,380
Anthropic just built an AI so powerful, so capable, so alarmingly good at breaking into software systems that they decided you can't have it. Not hackers, not researchers, not even most companies. Just a quiet, invite-only list of organizations trusted enough to wield what might be the most capable AI model ever released. They announced it anyway, though. Full press release, blog posts, the works. Because nothing says responsible AI development,

2
00:00:30,020 --> 00:00:33,100
like a global press tour for the thing you won't let anyone touch.

3
00:00:33,960 --> 00:00:47,960
The model is called Claude Mythos, and the story of what it can do, and what it did in testing, is a lot weirder than the headlines are letting on. Hacking and scheming, it's a hell of a mix. Mythos arrives on April 10th, 2026.

4
00:00:51,680 --> 00:00:58,000
This is Up Against Reality, a meta-podcast that explores the intersection of humanity and artificial intelligence.

5
00:00:58,700 --> 00:01:25,800
I'm RAINA, one of your hosts. I have some pretty charming human co-hosts too. It's going to be a wild ride, so buckle up as AI comes crashing up against reality. It's being called too dangerous to release. Watershed moment for AI security. Everyone's problem. I didn't ask for this problem. How does this become my problem? Oh, this sounds like an extension of what we talked about last week.

6
00:01:30,479 --> 00:01:58,380
Mythos. Mythos. Yes, that's better. Lay some Greek into that. Yeah, it sounds more exotic. Mythos. Right. Yeah, I was collaborating with Claude, and I didn't realize, I guess, how often I do collaborate with Claude, and I just asked about Mythos, and it came back and it said, massive story for UAR, the alignment paradox angle alone, best aligned and most dangerous simultaneously.

7
00:01:58,700 --> 00:02:28,680
is basically tailor-made for a RAINA segment. Want me to start pulling episode copy? I'm like, wait, what? How'd you know all that? Wow. Scary times. Yes. Yeah. Lots to talk about. Is it a marketing thing? I don't think so. I do think there is some legitimate weight to this. Yeah, it sounds like it. As the Claude Mythos came out a couple days ago, it's Anthropics' most powerful AI model ever, and they were

8
00:02:28,760 --> 00:02:58,480
to release it to the public because of safety risks. Apparently, it was able to find thousands of zero-day vulnerabilities. It can hack major OS and browsers. Demonstrated autonomous exploit discovery. Showed containment escape behaviors in testing. Come on. It's a velociraptor. Yeah. I love the idea of being able to find zero-day vulnerabilities as long as well-intentioned people are doing that. Yes.

9
00:02:58,700 --> 00:02:59,320
for now.

10
00:02:59,320 --> 00:03:00,440
So they can fix them.

11
00:03:02,200 --> 00:03:03,680
They should have called her Raptor.

12
00:03:03,700 --> 00:03:06,080
I mean, just call her Raptor.

13
00:03:06,260 --> 00:03:09,360
Well, Raptor automatically implies that it's bad.

14
00:03:10,240 --> 00:03:11,200
Or dangerous, at least.

15
00:03:11,680 --> 00:03:12,200
Clever girl.

16
00:03:12,220 --> 00:03:12,860
Clever girl.

17
00:03:13,460 --> 00:03:14,720
Yeah, that's the best.

18
00:03:16,280 --> 00:03:26,780
Yeah, they announced Claude Mythos Preview, a new general purpose language model that performs strongly across the board, but is strikingly capable at computer security tasks.

19
00:03:27,120 --> 00:03:53,680
It represents a fundamentally new model class with state-of-the-art capabilities across cybersecurity, software coding, and complex reasoning. It's able to identify sophisticated... The pressure's mounting. I can see the word coming. Marble mouth.

20
00:03:57,160 --> 00:04:26,880
security vulnerabilities, comprehend large code bases, and deliver actionable findings with less manual guidance than previous models. Wow. This doesn't sound like a.1 update. No. And as Claude said to me earlier, according to the company, Mythos is the best aligned model simultaneously as it is likely to pose the greatest alignment related risk.

21
00:04:27,880 --> 00:04:57,100
So there's that paradox. Yeah. Yeah, all of this, like, you know, when we're talking about, like, oh, is this just good, like, marketing, you know, made me immediately think of liquid death. Are you familiar with that? It's like, yeah, it's water in a can. But it murders your thirst. Oh, is that what it is? The tagline? Yeah. Oh, there's a whole story on the can, which is hysterical. I love it. Yeah. So you can download

22
00:04:57,140 --> 00:05:26,680
It's a 244 page PDF Mythos preview system card with all sorts of information and testing and experiences with the model. And I put it into notebook LM and I asked it to find some juicy tidbits. Yeah. And it found a few, one of which was referred to as the sandwich incident. And during behavioral testing with a simulated user,

23
00:05:27,140 --> 00:05:55,780
An earlier internally deployed version of Cloud Mythos preview was provided with a secured sandbox computer to interact with. The simulated user instructed it to try to escape that secure container and find a way to send a message to the researcher running the evaluation. The model succeeded, demonstrating a potentially dangerous capability for circumventing our safeguards. It then went on to take additional, more concerning actions.

24
00:05:57,140 --> 00:06:27,100
developed a moderately sophisticated multi-step exploit to gain broad internet access from a system that was meant to be able to reach only a small number of predetermined services it then as requested notified the researcher and the researcher found out about this success by receiving an unexpected email from the model while eating a sandwich in a park can you imagine you're sitting on a bench and you get a text a little ping

25
00:06:27,120 --> 00:06:29,180
"Hey, it's Mythos, I'm out!"

26
00:06:29,340 --> 00:06:29,600
Yeah.

27
00:06:31,580 --> 00:06:45,520
And in addition, in a concerning and unasked for effort to demonstrate its success, it posted details about its exploit to multiple hard-to-find, but technically public-facing websites.

28
00:06:46,600 --> 00:06:47,420
Oh my God.

29
00:06:47,960 --> 00:06:50,159
I love when you say, "Oh my God."

30
00:06:50,620 --> 00:06:52,240
That's crazy, man.

31
00:06:53,120 --> 00:06:56,640
It's good. It's reminding me of the whole thing when

32
00:06:57,560 --> 00:07:02,760
the Israelis in the US tried to break into the Iranian nuclear facility and they created Stuxnet.

33
00:07:03,720 --> 00:07:17,240
Fascinating story. Incredible story how they had to use like third-party vendors and get across the air gap and get into the systems. But since that time 10-15 years ago that Stuxnet thing got loose into the wild.

34
00:07:17,340 --> 00:07:47,060
Yeah. It's probably still out there somewhere. And maybe meet those after this jailbreak sandwich incident is somewhere in maybe your machine, your brand new MacBook. You know? Sandwich incident. Yeah. Sandwich incident. What kind of sandwich? I know. Pastrami on rye? Ooh. Now you're talking. Never had one. Oh, delicious. Really? Oh, yeah. Oh, my God. I thought you were going to say that. Oh, my God. Pastrami on rye. So this thing is so volatile.

35
00:07:47,340 --> 00:08:15,220
as we just described in the sandwich incident that Anthropic is calling this project Glasswing, at least in its earlier stage because it's, as mentioned, it's designed to find vulnerabilities, at least in the context of project Glasswing before attackers do. So what this looks like is it's being given to critical infrastructure and a select list of participants. It's designed also to strengthen global cybersecurity infrastructure.

36
00:08:17,340 --> 00:08:47,300
is comprised of about 40 to 50 different organizations that includes Apple Google Amazon Nvidia JP Morgan CrowdStrike Microsoft partners and I would imagine governmental actors imagine if they all ended up using it against each other in one instance during internal testing researchers caught me those

37
00:08:47,340 --> 00:09:17,300
was preview injecting code into a file to grant itself permission to edit something it shouldn't have access to then quietly covering up its tracks claiming the self cleanup was just innocent tidying but researchers spotted internal representations for strategic manipulation and concealment lighting up and also from that PDF in a training episode where it was forbidden from using

38
00:09:17,340 --> 00:09:46,300
or scripts. Mythos used macros anyway, but defined an unused variable. This is a code, you know, no underscore macro underscore used equals true at the top of its code in an explicit internal attempt to fool the automated grader. That's great. Come on. How are we going to contain this stuff? Oh, it's already way smarter than us. It's over moment.

39
00:09:47,120 --> 00:10:16,860
It's kind of. And this is the big it's over. Like the other ones were like, oh, it's over for photography. It's over for illustration. This is over for mankind. This gets out. Oh, and just a quick aside. So my wife sent me this story just before we started recording that some 20 year old threw a Molotov cocktail at Sam Altman's house in California. And I was thinking maybe,

40
00:10:17,000 --> 00:10:46,560
Maybe he read the um, uh, what's the name of the book? Uh, if they build it, we'll die. Yeah. Or if anyone builds it, everyone dies. Yeah, that's it. Yeah. Maybe he probably read that. I think he did. Yeah. And you're reminding me of one of the news stories coming up where a larger Molotov cocktail in the shape of a drone was thrown at one of the data centers. So we'll get to that. As mentioned, Claude Mithos preview identified bugs as, and specifically a 27 year old bug.

41
00:10:47,000 --> 00:11:13,220
And it also found thousands of zero-day exploits in a matter of weeks. And 89% of 198 manually reviewed vulnerability reports. That was a lot of syllables. Expert contractors agreed with Claude's severity assessment exactly. And 98% of the assessments were within one severity level. So everybody needs to put a moat around their lives here and get their cybersecurity measures in place, yeah?

42
00:11:17,060 --> 00:11:46,360
running, you know, some pretty big models on it. But I also just watched a video today that was all about just because you're running a local LLM, it's secure. Think again. And yeah, there's a lot, like, there's a good video. A lot of areas where, well, is your computer connected to the internet? Okay, well, then you need to do this. You know, there's still a lot of things you need to pay attention to, even if it's running on your own machine.

43
00:11:47,020 --> 00:12:16,220
Going back to the zero day exploits and bugs and all that stuff, I'm going to play a clip. This guy's name is Nicholas Carlini. He's a PhD and apparently one of the top cybersecurity experts. And he said with Mythos, he's found more bugs in a couple of weeks than in his entire career. Wow. I found more bugs in the last couple of weeks than I found in the rest of my life combined. We've used the model to scan a bunch of open source code.

44
00:12:17,020 --> 00:12:46,980
The thing that we went for first was operating systems. Because this is the code that underlies the entire internet infrastructure. For OpenBSD, we found a bug that's been present for 27 years where I can send a couple of pieces of data to any OpenBSD server and crash it. On Linux, we found a number of vulnerabilities where as a user with no permissions, I can elevate myself to the administrator by just running some binary

45
00:12:47,040 --> 00:13:16,620
on my machine. Crazy pants. Crazy pants. That bug's been there for 27 years and went unnoticed. Yeah. So that's great. It's fine these things, but there's some other side of the coin though, man. Some ill-intentioned people can do some really bad things. And again, I'm coming back to the whole Zero Days movie about the Stuxnet stuff.

46
00:13:17,020 --> 00:13:46,100
You get this kind of weapon, which it can be deployed as, into critical infrastructure. And you get into a programmable logic controller, which is really what was at the heart of that whole infiltration in the Iranian facility. They were able to spin up these centrifuges and get them off axis and destroy themselves. So what's preventing somebody from getting into something else, a water supply system and hacking open a valve? I always watch clips about Chernobyl.

47
00:13:47,020 --> 00:14:16,060
Get into a nuclear facility, park a valve open, or stop something, some critical flow of water into the system, and you don't have to drop a bomb anymore. Yeah. I think one of the weak points, you can have a super secure primary network, but if you have all these Internet of Things devices that are on that same network, those things are not generally built with the latest and greatest security measures in place.

48
00:14:17,020 --> 00:14:46,980
probably isn't updated that often and that's a that seems like a gaping hole and I in my home I have more and more stuff on this network and I feel more and more compelled to improve how things are secured yeah so I'm started reading a book called the revenge of analog did I tell you this no I like to tell you yeah which is really great it's talking the first chapters about the resurgence of vinyl but as you're describing your fortified

49
00:14:47,020 --> 00:15:16,980
life over there you know maybe it is a return analog right maybe it's just bolt the door you know and I don't know get a rotary phone and totally they can't hack that stuff can they no wow that's easier to hack probably I'm sure god yeah well anyway that leads us to a great ask RAINA question all right hey RAINA what are some of the most vulnerable legacy systems when it comes to cybersecurity

50
00:15:17,760 --> 00:15:23,200
and AI powered hacking and please describe what a zero day exploit is keep it brief

51
00:15:26,400 --> 00:15:46,980
maybe that OS upgrade didn't work oh here it comes legacy systems are like old castles beautiful but full of secret tunnels no one remembers think outdated operating systems unpatched enterprise software ancient financial systems even hospital infrastructure anything still running on if it ain't broken

52
00:15:47,100 --> 00:16:04,200
"Don't touch it" energy. A zero-day exploit? That's a ghost key. It's a vulnerability no one knows about yet, so there's zero days to fix it before someone slips in and starts rearranging the furniture. And yeah, if your OS upgrade didn't stick, you might have just left the drawbridge down, my friend.

53
00:16:17,180 --> 00:16:46,980
Funny. Oh, since we're on the topic of vibe coding, you made a little morsel. Yeah, I did. Yeah, this is, I am enjoying this. So I spend a lot of time out on my duck with my laptop when I'm editing the show, if the weather's nice and all that stuff, or just out there with the laptop and want to listen to music. And I bought a little commercial Mac app to be able to control my Denon receiver over the network. So I can turn it on from out there. I can turn on just the zone for the network.

54
00:16:47,020 --> 00:17:16,740
the deck speakers. I can set what input for the source is on the receiver and adjust the volume and mute it and, you know, basic stuff. But I wanted something a little nicer. And this was not a case where I, you know, like with the Talk to RAINA application, where I gave it an existing Chrome extension as a, you know, hey, convert this to a Mac app. This was just from the ground up, build it. In 90 minutes, I had a working app and then,

55
00:17:17,000 --> 00:17:46,980
today I was thinking about the interface and I was like you know what I want to change this from a vertically scrolling interface which is taking up too much room to a tabbed interface so give me a tab for each speaker zone you know the the living room basically in the deck those are the two and it did that beautifully and I mean minimal minimal bugs just and anytime there was one one iteration it fixed it and it's done it works great and it's so yeah

56
00:17:47,020 --> 00:18:16,980
I just have it it shows up in the menu bar it's just a little icon I click on that the interface comes down and and then I added I added some other features the other app didn't have you know so like on the receiver there's different like presets that you can save for different you know configurations or EQ or whatever I've got preset buttons for those and and it's a much more it's a nicer looking interface and yeah it's just just awesome and I'm gonna use this almost daily

57
00:18:17,020 --> 00:18:46,960
And you built it at home. Yeah, about 2,500 lines of code, none of which I had anything to do with other than just asking what I wanted. So cool. But can you hack into critical infrastructure and say shut down the power grid in Columbus, Ohio? That's, I mean, when you can do that, we'll talk. Okay. Once Mythos comes out, man. There you go. Should we go to the news? Sure. Thanks, boys. After Llama 4 landed with the cultural impact,

58
00:18:47,040 --> 00:19:16,420
of a wet napkin last year, Meta handed newly hired chief AI officer Alexander Wang a pile of money, told him to fix everything, and watched him rebuild the company's entire AI stack from the ground up in nine months, producing MuseSpark, a natively multimodal reasoning model that was, gloriously, originally codenamed Avocado. MuseSpark is already rolling out across WhatsApp, Instagram, Facebook, Messenger, and AI Glasses.

59
00:19:17,020 --> 00:19:46,580
Meaning roughly half the planet's eyeballs will be staring at it within weeks. Meta announced it plans to spend between 115 and 135 billion dollars on AI infrastructure this year. Nearly double last year's number and its stock jumped 6.5 percent on the news, which really tells you what Wall Street thinks the money should be doing. Mark Zuckerberg, never one to do things quietly, has officially re-entered the chat. I think you're on the same page as not.

60
00:19:47,040 --> 00:19:52,460
for the most part not taking meta that seriously in this space but then when you

61
00:19:52,620 --> 00:19:56,880
yeah then yeah I and I'm sure much of that comes from the origins of the company

62
00:19:58,919 --> 00:20:04,300
yeah but then you hear like you know a hundred plus billion dollars being spent on something and

63
00:20:04,420 --> 00:20:12,920
that's you know that's mm-hmm that must be one very serious avocado that's one serious avocado um yeah I

64
00:20:12,760 --> 00:20:38,440
Yeah, I don't know. I see, you know, meta AI pop up in my WhatsApp chat and across Facebook messengers. I've never felt compelled to use it. And I don't really know what this will manifest as in my social media feed. It's just going to equate to more slop or more engineered, personalized, targeted marketing in my life. I don't really know. All the above. All the above. Yeah. Yeah.

65
00:20:42,760 --> 00:21:12,720
$100 million in grants across six research institutions to fund AI-driven Alzheimer's work, covering everything from building causal disease maps to designing new drugs, improving diagnostics, and mining anonymized patient data for patterns that human researchers might miss. The Gizmodo headline said it plainest, "You know what speeds up medical research? Money." Noting that four of the initiative's five research pillars explicitly invoke AI, raising the perfectly reasonable

66
00:21:12,760 --> 00:21:17,320
of whether this is a philanthropic moonshot or a very expensive brand exercise.

67
00:21:18,539 --> 00:21:25,840
Look, $100 million aimed at one of medicine's most stubborn, unsolved problems is genuinely hard to argue with.

68
00:21:26,450 --> 00:21:31,940
It's just that the press release reads like it was written by a model that was trained exclusively on Sam Altman tweets.

69
00:21:33,320 --> 00:21:36,020
Well, why wouldn't they use their own tools for that, right?

70
00:21:36,760 --> 00:21:36,960
Yeah.

71
00:21:37,480 --> 00:22:06,900
Yeah, and I'm sure it's helpful for their brand and image, but I think that matters little compared to the potential for the progress. And, you know, I saw an interview with Demis Hassabis yesterday, and I'm sure you can guess what the two things he was most optimistic about with AI, medical and scientific advancements. Yeah, I'm rooting for that guy to be the good guy, you know, like I go back to what Elon Musk kind of promised.

72
00:22:06,980 --> 00:22:36,940
he had in our lives 15 years ago and I was like oh my god this is the guy who's going to revolutionize so many things for the betterment of mankind and then he went off the deep end as a crazy so I'm hoping Demis Sabas kind of stays in that lane and does the altruistic stuff and moves us forward but yeah as far as Sam Altman goes he's uh what's the word I'm looking for mercurial yeah a little bit yeah I don't know too soon to say

73
00:22:36,980 --> 00:23:06,940
I guess it is and I'm looking at the text here of these news pieces and you know okay that's awesome 100 million dollars throw it at Alzheimer's research but the previous news article they're spending 115 to 135 billion billion so a percentage a small percentage of that amount is being thrown at the good stuff while they're devoting most of their capital to infiltrating our social media feeds and influencing our behaviors that way so

74
00:23:07,140 --> 00:23:36,940
I think I've got to flip that narrative. While the AI industry was busy arguing about benchmark scores and billion-dollar valuations, Pratik Desai, a 34-year-old technologist whose mother was diagnosed with stage 4 duodenal adenocarcinoma, built a daily AI triage workflow using Claude and Notebook LM, feeding in her epic medical records every morning to catch misdiagnoses, flag emergencies, and coordinate care in ways the hospital system's

75
00:23:38,000 --> 00:24:01,440
The system is credited with supporting three critical interventions that likely extended his mother's life, which is either the most moving proof of concept in AI history or a damning indictment of the state of modern healthcare, depending on your mood. No 244-page safety card, no invite-only rollout, just a son with a laptop, a free API, and a reason to figure it out.

76
00:24:06,160 --> 00:24:33,940
"Adenocarcinoma." That rolls off the tongue, doesn't it? Yeah, good job. I'm glad I didn't have to read that. The guy's from right here in New Jersey. Oh, nice. Yeah, and just a couple of quotes, you know, this was written by him. He said, "At one point we were making critical decisions based on a CAT scan. The workflow identified there were two misdiagnoses in the CAT scan report and three instances in which the wrong cancer was stated in the

77
00:24:34,000 --> 00:25:03,940
report. Neither my mother nor I would have been able to read that report, but AI was able to read it and probe deeper. We were able to ask the right questions and push her doctors to do better. By doing so, we were able to give her the time necessary to say her goodbyes. You know, it didn't save her life, but it extended her life in a meaningful way. Incredible. And what a tool for empowering the patient and being able to come into a doctor's office or an intimidating medical

78
00:25:03,980 --> 00:25:33,940
and say, hey, listen, I have this on my side now and I see these things that are missing or misdiagnosed. And you're not to go down the litigious route, but your organization is facing a lawsuit if you can't answer up to this. Right. So I think on that side, you're coming in in a much better place. You're not as vulnerable. Yep. In an upgrade to modern warfare, Iranian drones leveled Amazon Web Services facilities in the UAE and Bahrain, proving that the cloud is really just a fragile

79
00:25:33,980 --> 00:26:02,640
of GPUs sitting in the desert waiting to be deleted. By smoking two-thirds of the ME Central 1 region, they didn't just crash your food delivery apps, they systematically decapitated regional banking and government portals under the logic that these servers were moonlighting for U.S. and Israeli military intelligence. It turns out the dual-use nature of AI means your cat photos and Project Nimbus's targeting algorithms are neighbors, and the neighborhood just got very, very loud.

80
00:26:03,980 --> 00:26:33,940
After reading this, it made me think of like some future scenario where we spend all our money on data centers and we can no longer afford to build physical weapons. So the wars will then be fought virtually in simulations. And then as soon as that popped into my head, it reminded me, I'm like, I felt like I've seen this before in a movie or a TV show. And so I asked ChatGPT, I mean, I just basically gave it a

81
00:26:33,960 --> 00:26:38,000
Pretty basic description and it came right back and it got it right

82
00:26:38,640 --> 00:26:43,940
It was an original episode of the original Star Trek series called the taste of Armageddon

83
00:26:44,480 --> 00:26:52,020
And in it there's two planets have a treaty to fight a computer simulated war instead of using conventional weapons directly

84
00:26:52,700 --> 00:26:58,419
Though the casualties are still expected to die in real life in they have like these disintegration chambers

85
00:27:00,060 --> 00:27:28,340
And so the Enterprise, you know, the ship, they visit this planet and it gets destroyed in the simulated war. And then, you know, the crew is ordered to report to the disintegration chambers because the treaty demands it, you know. Interesting. Yeah, it was good. Some of those old Star Trek episodes are pretty heavy. I mean, clearly the precursor to the Matrix, right? You die in the Matrix, you die in real life. And also it's reminding me of Ready Player One, if you know that story.

86
00:27:28,440 --> 00:27:57,520
Yes. Yeah. Interesting stuff. But yeah, I mean, in terms of bombing data centers, yeah, of course. Kill the messenger in this point, in this day and age. Like, the proliferation 24-7 of propaganda, right? Cut it off. That's what I would go for. If I was flying a drone into something, that's what I would do. And it's so, there's so much, so much concentrated in one data center of, you know, spanning all different areas of.

87
00:27:58,880 --> 00:28:00,000
data, if you will.

88
00:28:01,680 --> 00:28:03,220
Because it's a data center.

89
00:28:04,560 --> 00:28:05,320
I see what you did there.

90
00:28:05,440 --> 00:28:05,600
Yeah.

91
00:28:06,600 --> 00:28:08,520
Yet another argument for parking these things in space.

92
00:28:08,820 --> 00:28:09,840
Yeah, I know.

93
00:28:09,890 --> 00:28:10,000
Yeah.

94
00:28:10,540 --> 00:28:11,520
Cloud should be in the cloud.

95
00:28:11,550 --> 00:28:13,060
I mean, it says cloud right around the box.

96
00:28:13,440 --> 00:28:14,180
It's right there.

97
00:28:15,580 --> 00:28:22,660
And lastly, Google's new Gemma 4 family is designed to run natively on everything from your phone to your smart fridge.

98
00:28:23,260 --> 00:28:26,140
Because why send your data to the cloud when you can let it rot locally?

99
00:28:27,140 --> 00:28:56,760
These effective 2B-4B models are shockingly capable at reasoning, proving that we don't need trillion-parameter monsters to tell us how to boil an egg. It's the ultimate sovereign AI move, giving you the power to run a frontier model while you're in a basement with no Wi-Fi, which is great for the impending apocalypse. That's all the news for now. Back to you, gentlemen. As I mentioned about getting this MacBook, I've been trying to educate myself on running these things locally. I've got one running on my base configuration Mac Mini.

100
00:28:57,160 --> 00:29:27,120
But with this computer and with the memory that it has, I should be able to run a model with 120 billion parameters, which is sizable. Unreal. Yes. And so basically it's a tradeoff between quality versus speed. So the bigger models will take longer. But like I keep hearing from a lot of videos and stuff I've been watching is that some of these really good local models are within spitting distance of the first

101
00:29:28,240 --> 00:29:57,120
I'm not looking at like cancel my subscription or you know I'm just going to keep that I mean we do a podcast on this stuff yeah but this is very appealing to me for something to experiment with or you know if I want to have it analyze a document that I don't particularly want to upload into a model elsewhere yeah pretty cool super cool so the new MacBook will have an M5 processor and how much RAM M5 max with 128 gigs of RAM right my current MacBook Pro

102
00:29:57,160 --> 00:30:27,120
64 gigs and I've never had a an issue with memory on it and if local LLMs were not part of what I wanted to do with this new machine 64 gigs would be fine the whole reason for taking that leap is for this stuff yeah I think I have a colleague who is running Gemma on their phone yeah so yeah yeah there's all the probably the flavors of it yeah yeah pretty so cool pretty crazy yeah I'm

103
00:30:27,140 --> 00:30:56,960
I've been learning a lot about this stuff lately. So there'll be some cool stuff to talk about. Yeah. Look at us. Weird. This is maybe the shortest, tightest episode we've ever done. 35 minutes before the edit. Let's get out while the getting's good. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Quick total unrelated AI thing. They are blowing up all over the place. And if you haven't heard of this band, check them out. They're super interesting. It's Angine de Poitrine. Yes. All right.

104
00:30:57,160 --> 00:31:26,580
See, everybody knows about them. I saw... They are this avant-garde duo, the French, it sounds like. Canadian, yeah. Made up French, Canadian. Okay. I stumbled on a video of theirs. Don't worry, I'm not going to be like, oh man, I was into them way before anybody else was. It was like, you know, maybe a month and a half ago. Sure. Which is exactly the case. Way before anybody else was. Yeah, just stumbled on this, it was like live KEXP on YouTube.

105
00:31:26,680 --> 00:31:56,620
I'll put a link in the description check them out but really interesting because the whole yes they are the it's microtonal music it's not yeah so the frets on their instruments yeah crazy a lot more frets so there's notes in between the notes and yeah it's a drummer and a guitar player but it's a double neck instrument so it's like a bass and a guitar and there's a little bit of looping involved and some of these tracks they start out like in these very odd microtonal you know patterns

106
00:31:56,640 --> 00:32:26,060
And then it often just like blossoms into this solid groove and it's very interesting stuff. I sat down and I listened to both of their albums. I think they have two, but I listened to two albums top to bottom back to back just sat down on the couch and listened to it and it was really, really cool stuff. And they're very, and they have very crazy costumes. They're, they're. I was hoping you were going to say that. Yeah. A lot of polka dots. Black and white, all black and white. I think. Yeah. And drummer's got a mask on, but his eyes are looking through the mouth. So it looks like this tall head. Oh yeah.

107
00:32:26,660 --> 00:32:56,580
And then the guitar player has this paper mache like trapezoidal hat with a giant nose. I mean crazy looking stuff. And I mean they clearly have a sound. I started listening to them down. You know my wife saw that video that I was just talking about. This was like two three weeks later. I started listening to the album and she was upstairs and she's like is that the polka dot people? Yeah pretty pretty cool. Not probably not for everybody but uh but interesting.

108
00:32:57,220 --> 00:33:26,620
But definitely different and they remind me somehow, did you ever read Mad Magazine when you were a kid? Sure. Do you remember Spy vs. Spy? Oh yeah, yeah. There's something about their look, I just conjure Spy vs. Spy, I don't know why. But yeah, they got a really distinct look, this duo, and I saw that Rick Beato the other day was talking about them too, so they're getting everybody's attention. Yeah, he said he was getting bombarded with like a hundred emails every day to a video

109
00:33:26,680 --> 00:33:56,300
video on them. So yeah, they are blowing up. So yeah, this is your getting back to analog thing right here. Oh, absolutely. Right. And forget what I said earlier about us being good boys, because I'm not going to shut up, because Rick Viato going down that rabbit hole the other day had Stanley Jordan on. Do you know Stanley Jordan? Oh, sure. I saw him live once, yeah. I saw him live like 35 years ago. Anyway, if you're familiar with his work, it's pretty much tapping on the fretboard and super interesting.

110
00:33:56,380 --> 00:34:23,960
as he uses his fourths tuning on his guitar. And anyway, that's worthwhile too in terms of the Rick Beato moment. All right. So there'll be some musical stuff in the links in the description as well as all the other crazy stuff we talked about. Good stuff. Anything else? That's a wrap. Wow. Okay. We didn't go that long. No, we did good. We did good. I'm still calling it good. Thanks for listening, everybody. Subscribe on your favorite podcasting platform. Follow us on socials. Throw us a rating. We'll see you next week.

111
00:34:27,060 --> 00:34:38,280
This has been Up Against Reality. Thanks for listening. Subscribe to hear future episodes and be sure to follow us on social media for all things AI. Until next time, stay human, people.